<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The T Trails	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://skopelos-walks.com/the-t-trails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://skopelos-walks.com/the-t-trails/</link>
	<description>with Heather Parsons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Thekla		</title>
		<link>https://skopelos-walks.com/the-t-trails/#comment-49551</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thekla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://skopelos-walks.com/?p=18057#comment-49551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The fundings the major council takes are not taken for rendering specific services.
They are taken to SHOW that work, services are done, and to find ways to&quot;steal&quot; money. 
The fundings are followed and bids are made, so that the major can put his hands on more money, money goes to pockets not services. The major shows that services are done, not for election reasons and to the sources, i e. Europe. 
Accordingly, the bid, the proposal does not have to be realistic, or according to real needs - since this is not the way it goes. It does not start from real needs, then bidding. It starts from searching around for available funds, to get more money in the pockets, (secondly to show that the council gets funds, thus is productive,), and then producing a proposal, that seems ok, and clise to &quot;modern&quot; criteria possibly, to get the fund. The service is not thought of being carried out any way to begin with. This is the council s way. No point in posting my comment. Do not think that it will help or enlighten anybody. I wrote to clear out for you the story, in case they is helpful. Do not post it, if you may. Of course, I do not mind if you will. The only way things are done is if you do it &quot;side ways&quot;, collect the eyes on you, maybe by tourists and money is coming. Then, they will be obliged]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fundings the major council takes are not taken for rendering specific services.<br />
They are taken to SHOW that work, services are done, and to find ways to&#8221;steal&#8221; money.<br />
The fundings are followed and bids are made, so that the major can put his hands on more money, money goes to pockets not services. The major shows that services are done, not for election reasons and to the sources, i e. Europe.<br />
Accordingly, the bid, the proposal does not have to be realistic, or according to real needs &#8211; since this is not the way it goes. It does not start from real needs, then bidding. It starts from searching around for available funds, to get more money in the pockets, (secondly to show that the council gets funds, thus is productive,), and then producing a proposal, that seems ok, and clise to &#8220;modern&#8221; criteria possibly, to get the fund. The service is not thought of being carried out any way to begin with. This is the council s way. No point in posting my comment. Do not think that it will help or enlighten anybody. I wrote to clear out for you the story, in case they is helpful. Do not post it, if you may. Of course, I do not mind if you will. The only way things are done is if you do it &#8220;side ways&#8221;, collect the eyes on you, maybe by tourists and money is coming. Then, they will be obliged</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
